Oval

The Oval – A bit of Aussie fight and some typical English weather

A couple of days into the final Test and some once familiar dynamics of Ashes Series in England, frame this match. Australia has shown some decent resolve in their batting and gloomy, wet skies have penetrated the momentum of play.

Opening the batting

On Day One Australia won their second toss of the series, batted first and made a decent fist of it. On a slow and fairly dry surface the approach demanded initial graft and patience and required batsmen to play late. David Warner wasn’t able to comply and played a loose, booming shot, devoid of footwork. A thick edge sailed to 1st slip. I’ve stated my feelings on Warner’s ability to safely open the batting, and this type of dismissal strengthens my belief that this isn’t his best position, yet.

Chris Rogers only made 23, but soaked up 100 balls. He consumed the best of the opening bowlers, softened the seam and wore the lacquer off the Duke. He protected the middle order and put on a century partnership with new number 3, Shane Watson. For me, that’s what opening in a Test Match is about.

England’s selection

England’s decision to play a second spinner is interesting, and hasn’t worked so far. But, this might, in part, be due to picking the wrong spinner. They’ve overlooked Monty Panesar, a proven left arm spinner, in favour of Simon Kerrigan, who was belted to all parts by Shane Watson. England were required to bowl 128 overs to Australia, Captain Cook felt Kerrigan was only worth 8 and he went for 6.6 per over. It’s early days and the kid might turn it around yet.

Day Two

I didn’t see a ball bowled on Day Two. I hung out last night for as long as possible, but after a solid day’s work, a gym session, a short run and 90minutes at cricket training I was pretty beat. Frustrated by the rain and poor light, I declared at about 2300. Unfortunately I missed a gallant knock by Steve Smith.

Smith was in the side a few years ago, picked in confusing circumstances as a bowling all-rounder – a leg spinner. It didn’t work for him. He went into exile and strengthened his batting in the Sheffield Shield and returned during the Border-Gavaskar trophy. He’s a fidgety customer, could be accused of having a bout of hyperbulia, but looks capable and recorded his maiden Test century overnight with a 138 not-out. Added to his two 50s this series, for me he’s done enough to be one of four certainties in Australia’s top order for the First Test in Australia.

Shane Watson

Shane Watson was on the edge of oblivion going into this Test Match. A walking LBW candidate, Watson managed to avoid his typical dismissal and made an excellent 176, saving his career, for now.

Stuart Broad

Stuart Broad’s spell in the second session on Day One included fiercely aggressive, short-pitched bowling of a high standard. Few people in the world would enjoy facing what Broad served up. Michael Clarke was forced to shut his eyes twice and put his bat out in front of his face for protection, hoping for the best as his splice and handle were struck by sharp lifters. Clarke survived Broad, but was rattled and Anderson bowled him. It was Broad who set it up. Broad also struck Watson in another nasty riser. It was a painful blow catching Watson on the underside of the helmet on the ear lobe.

I think Broad is a rhythm bowler, up and down and not much chop when he’s off colour, but fierce, accurate, challenging and versatile when he’s on the money.

The Australian series

I can’t wait for the return series in Australia, faster, bouncier and more lively pitches and good diversity should be on show from greenish Brisbane to dusty Adelaide, to the quickest pitch in the world at Perth, the all-round drop in at Melbourne and the traditional spinner at Sydney. Both bowling attacks will fancy the pitch buffet on offer.

But, we still have three days in London.

Australia declared at 9/492 and England’s openers got through 17overs for 32 runs. The forecast looks ordinary so this one could be headed for a draw. I hope there’s a twist or two to go.

http://www.facebook.com/CricketFroth

Fifth Ashes Test, The Oval – Australia’s selection riddle continues

Reports indicate Australia will make changes to its XI for the fifth and final Test. This means that in every one of its last 13 Test matches, Australia has changed its line up and batting order. We’ve lost 8 of those, with one to play.

For tonight’s Test at the Oval I can understand Mitchell Starc replacing Jackson Bird, but James Faulkner replacing Usman Khawaja?

Australia has significant problems with its batting, so what do we do? Drop a batsmen and bring in an all-rounder who averages 30 with the bat in First Class cricket.

The selection mismanagement and total lack of continuity and direction in this Australian set up is appalling. This isn’t to say that James Faulkner isn’t a reasonable candidate for selection, but the circumstances demand we pick our strongest possible batting line up. There is no evidence to suggest we’ve done that here.

The Selection Riddle

In early 2013 Ed Cowan was one of Australia’s better performers in a barren series in India, albeit as an opener. He was moved to number 3 for the First Ashes Test, but failed, and was dropped. Usman Khawaja replaced him at Lords. He lasted three Test Matches.

One 50 in 6 innings is hardly a suitable return, but the fact Khawaja (again) was picked meant the selectors believed he had the ability to become a Test standard number 3. You may fail to convert it, but you don’t lose ability 3 weeks. This is the second time Khawaja has been dropped from the Test side. He’s played 9 Tests and averages 25. Surely he’ll be consigned to some lengthy graft at Shield and County level to prove he is worthy once again?

Maybe not though, he could be back in the side sooner than that.

The establishment may handle Khawaja like they did Phil Hughes – who was dropped about 18months ago (for the second time), and consigned to less than half a season in Shield cricket, before being brought back to play at home versus Sri Lanka, and away in India.

Based on the mean, Hughes didn’t have a shocker in Inida, and retained his place for the First Ashes Test. He scored an 80odd not-out in the first innings at number 6, a less recognised cameo to the famous 98 by Ashton Agar. Hughes failed in the second innings of that Test, and was then promoted up the order to number 3 for the 2nd Test after Ed Cowan was dropped. In the Lords massacre, Hughes didn’t get a run and was dropped for the Third Test, replaced by David Warner.

Shane Watson is reportedly now the man to bat at 3, after batting at 4 and 5 in India, opening in the first 2 and a half Tests of this series, then batting at 6 in the last 3 innings.

Based on the continual shuffle, Khawaja might find himself opening the batting in the return series in Australia. Or he could be at number 6, or 4. Maybe even wicket keeper? Has he got a good set of gloves in his kit bag? Perhaps he should get some.

http://www.facebook.com/CricketFroth